Hitler and the Appeasement Policy of the 1930s Essay

Appeasement Policy was a foreign policy that was adapted by Britain and France in the 1930’s towards Germany. Britain and France let Hitler have whatever they considered necessary to preserve peace in Europe, as they merely wanted to focus on domestic issues, such as economy and unemployment . They believed that Hitler had certain aims and that once he had achieved these, he would be satisfied. So they allowed him to re-arm, invade the Rhineland (1936), and complete the Anschluss of Austria (1938) followed by the Sudetenland. Appeasement assumed Hitler would keep his side of the bargain, however it did not. Adolf Hitler proves that he is ruthless, a risk taker, and anti-Semitist throughout the†¦show more content†¦On September 27th, 1938 the Policy of Appeasement between Adolf Hitler and Neville Chamberlain had been strained. Chamberlain had neither desire nor economic stance to be drawn into a costly war. He was unwilling to oppose Hitler as he had feared another â€Å"Great War† would come into effect. Furthermore he favored a policy of appeasement. Chamberlain believed Hitler was a reasonable leader and planned on giving him whatever Germany needed, so that he could be satisfied or appeased. Chamberlain believed that Hitler would keep his promises. As well Canada’s Prime Minister, Mackenzie King was also in favor of appeasement and believed that Hitler was a â€Å"sincere man who had no intention to provoke a war.† He too, agreed with Chamberlain that Hitler could soon be appeased. Mackenzie King and Neville Chamberlain had what they believed to be good reasons for supporting appeasement, however Adolf Hitler was nothing but a cruel, ruthless man that manipulated all the countries leaders as to believing that he was a sincere, reasonable leader. In 1938 Germany achieved success in annexing Austria and Northwest Czechoslovakia. Hitler’s success in united Austria was due to the appeasement policy that British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain had adapted. Afterward, just after theShow MoreRelatedNazi Soviet Pact And The Treaty Of Versailles1600 Words   |  7 PagesAlthough Hitler s ambitions and ideology fuelled his aggressive foreign policy, which hinted that a military conflict was bound during the 1930 s, the failure of the policy of appeasement was largely responsible for the outbreak of the war in 1939. The failure of appeasement allowed Hitler to attain resources and land. This kind of expansion is a direct contributor into forming a violent and widespread battle that began in 1939. However, the failure of appeasement was also directly related withRead MoreThe Policy Of Appeasement During The Outbreak Of War Essay1332 Words   |  6 PagesEvaluate the view that the policy of appeasement played a major role in the outbreak of war in Europe in 1939. After the mass amount of life lost in World War One, many countries, through the League of Nations, opted to prevent future conflict. Due to the failure collective security, the idea that countries could discourage aggression, appeasement became a policy adopted in the 1930s, especially by the British. Appeasement was developed in the belief that countries such as Germany were unfairlyRead MoreJustifying Appeasement Essay example1192 Words   |  5 PagesJustifying Appeasement Appeasement was the foreign policy followed by the British and French governments in the 1930s, whereby they did not attack or confront other governments, specifically that of Germanys, when international laws were breached, but rather gave into some of the demands to keep the peace. After the horror and dramatic loss of innocent lives (amassing over 3 million) in the First World War, both the French and the British governments were keenRead MoreWorld War 2910 Words   |  4 Pagesbeen reached. However, in the late 1920 s and throughout the 1930 s, they realized that they were wrong. Dictators came into power in countries that were displeased with the results of World War I. Germany, Italy and Japan wanted power, so they took aggressive action that not even The League of Nations could stop. British Prime Minister Chamberlain thought that the best way to deal with Hitler was by following a policy of appeasement, but not everybody agreed with him. That is why the causes ofRead MoreTo What Extent Was the Policy of Appeasement the Main Cause for the Outbreak of War in Europe in 1939?1111 Words   |  5 PagesThe policy of appeasement was widely pursued by Britain and France in the 1930s, when it referred to attempting to satisfy Germanys demands by negotiation and compromise, which would avoid war. However due to its failure the policy of appeasement, to a large extent was responsible for the o utbreak of war in 1939. It is clear that if the Western Powers had retaliated against Hitler, war could have been avoided, it encouraged Hitler, Hitler could never be appeased, and that it prompted the Nazi-SovietRead MorePolicy of Appeasement: Good or Bad? - Essay836 Words   |  4 PagesPolicy of Appeasement: Good or Bad? After the Great War, Germany and a couple other countries were greatly punished, having to pay reparations and territorial losses. Hitler, soon to be a dictator, wanted to change that. He believed that Germany had been punished too severely and wanted revenge; because he had such a strong government and military, there were many ways of going about stopping him. During the 1930’s, the policy of appeasement was the most effective response to Hitler’s aggressionRead MorePutzier 1. Tessa Putzier. Ms. Jeanne Bitz . Language Arts.1293 Words   |  6 Pages1 Tessa Putzier Ms. Jeanne Bitz Language Arts March 27, 2017 The Causes Of World War Two On June, 28 1919, the Treaty of Versailles was signed. This treaty coupled with other factors, such as the Nazis rise to power in Germany, Europe’s policy of appeasement, and Germany’s invasion of Poland would lead to - and be direct causes of - World War II. In fact, when French military commander Marshal Foch heard of the signing of the Treaty of Versailles, her observed with extreme accuracy - â€Å"This isRead MoreThe Munich Agreement And The Anglo German Declaration1035 Words   |  5 Pagesinevitable between the great European powers and allowed Hitler to gather more territory with relative ease. This document between the powers of Germany, Italy, France, and the United Kingdom outlined the terms and conditions under which Germany would annex a large portion of Czechoslovakia. Throughout this text, the historical context and significance of the Munich Agreement will be analyzed. The Munich Agreement was produced in hopes to stop Hitler; he was threatening to unleash war upon Europe if heRead MoreBritain s Policy Of Appeasement2028 Words   |  9 PagesBritain in the 1930s followed a policy of appeasement to retain peace between countries and stop the fascist powers of Italy and Germany causing disruption. There is a subsequent amount of evidence to suggest the policy of appeasement was a failure due to events including the Abyssinian Crisis, the Reoccupation of the Rhineland, The Anglo-German Naval Agreement, the Spanish Civil War and the Anschluss. Although it can also be argued that Britain had some success with preventing the fascist powersRead MoreThe League Of Nations Of The United States1400 Words   |  6 Pagescritical situation in Europe in the 1930’s. The policy of Appeasement, fascist ideologies throughout Germany and Italy and the Nazi-soviet Aggression pact were all, in their own respect responsible for the outbreak of war in 1939. The League of Nations played a small role in the outbreak of war. The two key nations involved in the league were Britain and France, however, as Posselt states one key weakness of the league was that the USA was not involved. The leagues policy of collective security meant that

Overview of the Stock Market Free Essays

Over the past few years, many millionaires have been created due to the economical explosion of the stock market. The market isn†t just growing, as it did in the mid to late seventies; but it is on steroids, and is growing like never before. Backed by the relentless, yet sometimes spasmodic, growth of the NASDAQ Composite, Wall Street†s impact on the future cannot be denied. We will write a custom essay sample on Overview of the Stock Market or any similar topic only for you Order Now For as long as the market has been in existence, drastic changes such as these have never taken place. What awesome power could have produced so much money in so little time? What colossal force could have caused the United States† economy to flourish? The answer lies in one, simple, recently coined phrase: the tech stock. The stock market has been around since people traded silver for ownership of cargo 200 years ago, yet many people don†t know how it works, or where their money goes when they purchase a stock; they simply think â€Å"buy low, sell high. † Although this is a good basic investment plan, it is imperative that one knows where his money is headed when he buys a thousand dollars worth of a specific stock. When one purchases a stock, they are actually purchasing part of a company (Brian 1). The reason one would do this is because he wants part of the profits of the company. If one purchases 1% of a company, he will receive 1% of the income, to put it in a simplified manner. The money the company gains from selling their stock is placed back into the company. This way, the company can grow, and produce more profits for the stockholders. The company†s value is represented by the stock price on the stock exchange (Brian 2). Over time, a method of judging a stock†s performance, called the â€Å"profit to earning ratio† was created. P/E is shorthand for the ratio of a company’s share price to its per-share earnings. For example, a P/E ratio of 10 means that the company has $1 of annual, per-share earnings for every $10 in share price (Green 1). † This ratio basically represents how much money the investor is putting in per dollar earned. This was generally a good thing to look at when choosing a stock to invest in, but the P/E ratio can be misleading, especially in the few tech stocks that have tremendous stock prices, yet have little net profit. No one knows exactly when the tech stock came about, but it seems like it came all at once. The phrase â€Å"tech stock† simply refers to all stocks that deal with any form of technology related, directly or indirectly, to the computer or computer chips. A good portion of the popular tech stocks today deal with the Internet (Brian 4). One reason for this is the easy access by millions of people worldwide. Small companies are able to reach out to the whole globe with just a few bucks, and thus become prosperous over a short amount of time. Just a few of the most popular tech stock corporations include: Microsoft, Apple, TI, Amazon, Yahoo, and Dell. Companies such as Microsoft, Apple and Dell are companies that handle computers directly, and have been around for a long time (NASDAQ 5) TI creates many semiconductors that are found in most all products that have computer chips in them. Amazon and Yahoo are both directly related to the Internet. These companies are popular due to their originality and business management. However, popularity hardly gains profit, so why is it that Yahoo can make so much money on the stock market? Surprisingly and ironically enough, it is precisely popularity that causes its gains. Because of the popularity, people continue to purchase Yahoo†s stock. Although the company isn†t making direct profit, it certainly makes a lot of money from the stock purchases, so the company actually makes the money off of the stock market (Brian 5). Rare, indeed, to see this at such an extreme. With all of this success must come organization, and thus is the role of the NASDAQ Composite. Although NASDAQ came about long before the rise of tech stocks, it now represents the growth that they portray. This is mostly due to the large volume of blue chip Internet stocks that have joined the Composite, as well as the small technical companies that are looking for a big break. Duarte summarizes the whole NASDAQ universe in once sentence; â€Å"The NASDAQ is fueled by blue chip stocks and small caps which explode into high-earnings (Technology 1). † And explode it did. In just over one year, â€Å"The Index gained 1876. 62 points and 85. 59 percent for the year. The NASDAQ Composite Index also eclipsed the 3000 and 4000 point milestones during the last quarter of 1999† (Nasdaq 1). This far surpasses the Dow Jones Industrial, which only gained 25. 22% over the 1999-2000 year. â€Å"The market†s best index performers were the computer, telecommunications, and biotechnology up 105. 03 percent, 102. 71 percent and 101. 64 percent respectively† (Nasdaq 2). This obviously displays a growing interest in the tech stock, which has caused this major uprising to occur. One may wonder how the Dow Jones Industrial got off so bad, because, after all, it represents our nations largest companies. For a long time, the Dow Jones Industrial has represented the stock market as a whole, but times change. One cause of this change is the high interest rates that affect the corporate stocks such as Wal-Mart and ExxonMobil. These stocks reduce in price as a result of this, and therefore, the Dow average reflects the decrease. The Dow Jones blue chips remain stable, but haven†t increased dramatically, and this isn†t sufficient to make up for the losses of the stocks that tanked, such as banking stocks, financial stocks, and oil marketing stocks (Duarte, Technology 1). One thing that everyone wonders is â€Å"Is the gold rush over? † The answer is no, not as of 3-2-00, anyway. However, all good things must come to an end; the question is when. Milton Friedman and Alan Greenspan are both major authorities in Wall Street, and when they speak, the world of investors listens. The one bad thing is this, they usually never agree. In late 1999, Friedman â€Å"suggested the current market looks similar to the pre-crash markets in the U. S. in 1929 and the pre-crash market in Japan in 1989. † Soon after, â€Å"Greenspan made equally scary remarks about the stock market and the wealth effect† (Duarte, Greenspan 1). These are remarkable authorities in the world of investing, but these notes don†t specifically talk about the tech stock falling. Some people believe that the so-called â€Å"crash† that they spoke of has already happened at the turn of the millennium, when both the Dow Jones and the Nasdaq fell at record-breaking volumes. This proved that the NASDAQ wasn†t invincible with its precious tech stocks, but it also started an ugly observation that whatever the Dow does, the NASDAQ does at a more flamboyant rate (Jennings 1). This simply means that if the Dow goes up a little, the NASDAQ goes up a lot. When the Dow drops a little, the NASDAQ drops a lot (Fool 9). However, there†s no concrete evidence to prove this theory that they are connected somehow. January 4th, 2000; a sigh of relief sweeps the world as nothing too terribly devastating happens on the turn of the millennium. However, this sigh turns quickly into a gasp; at least for those watching the stock market. The Dow Jones plummets nearly 360 points, and NASDAQ plummets nearly 230 points in just one trading day. The next two days, NASDAQ continues to fall another 200 points, resulting in nearly a 8% drop in just three days. It recovers from this drop in only about two days, only to drop back into a lower pit in three more days. Those who held onto their pocketbooks for this roller coaster ride found a light at the end of the tunnel, and by the end of February, the Composite had climbed to the 4600 mark, 600 points higher than at the beginning of the year (Fool 1). Many other times in the first quarter of 2000 NASDAQ took a hefty fall, but it always regrouped and rallied to surpass it is original price. Another thing to remember is that NASDAQ isn†t made entirely of tech stock blue chips such as Dell and Amazon (Nasdaq 1). It is also made up of small caps that fail, large caps that fail, and those penny stocks that people get so worked up about†¦ that also fail; so it is hard to judge how well tech stocks are actually doing by looking directly at the NASDAQ Composite or P/E ratios. Tech stocks are still a relatively new thing for the market, and investors haven†t yet predicted their fate. However, they are still intensely popular, and as long as they are popular, people will keep buying; and, of course, if people buy them, they will raise in value. Technology is not going away any time soon, there†s no doubt about that; the future is now. Computers rule our lifestyle, making everything faster, easier, cheaper, more efficient; and these tech stocks represent our new economy based on this new efficient system. Even though they may not present themselves as strongly as they once did, tech stocks are definitely here to stay. How to cite Overview of the Stock Market, Essay examples

Worlds Together, Worlds Apart free essay sample

During 1600-1750, the explorers from the countries of Europe continue to explore for new countries to populate and riches to export back to their country. Some of the reasons the Europeans felt enhanced to the natives they came upon were their superior technology and different religious beliefs. The civilizations of Asia and the Middle East remained within their natural boundaries because the leaders of Japan, China, India and the Middle East were comfortable within their countries.New ideas exchanged with the people of different cultures bring new learning, inventions, and technology specially to the growing cities of Europe. Europe becomes the center of wealth, power, and colonization. The need for silver, sugar, spices, silks, cotton and porcelain drove trade so that products from each global region could be found virtually every. here else. Silver allowed economies to become commercialism and began to strengthen the hand of European trade. Some states became stronger because of trade( England, France, Holland, Japan). We will write a custom essay sample on Worlds Together, Worlds Apart or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Others became destabilize( the Mussels, the Mining, the Ottomans, the Safaris). European found wealth in the new worlds fertile ands by building plantations or harvesting furs. Wealth turned to military power very quickly. Economics and politics became closely intertwined with one providing resources and the other defense. Settlement of the Caribbean gave a boost to the African slave trade. Plantation managers worked slaves to death under horrifying living conditions, slaves worked six days a week morning to night.Slaves were transported to slave ports along the African coast where many died of hunger and disease waiting for a ships hold to be full. African slavers who captured and sold slaves to European buyers profited greatly. Regional leaders fought over control of the slave trade. Port cities harbored most wealth while the interior became penniless and stripped of its country population. The Dutch East India Company monopolized the spice trade of southeast Asia adopting aggressive policies against rivals. The Ottomans were forced to relinquish major European holdings due to poor leadership and economics becoming out of balance.The McHugh Empire taxed land owners and let trade come to India, this increased trade wealth, deed to the use of silver as the medium of exchange and provided new crops for Indian peasants. On the down side growing wealth among chinas local leaders weakened central control of the Mining and Mussels in India. Overseas trade produced no profits for the court but exceedingly enriched local merchants and smugglers. Chinas economy experienced rapid growth and associated problems. Silver imports stimulated growth and increased revenues but hurt the peasantry.China suffered from inflation when too much silver was injected into chinas domestic economy. Disruptions in the flow of silver from outside china also injured the local economy. Europeans has established considerable presence in Japan as traders and missionaries, constant fighting and competition disrupted stability. Japanese authorities banned Christianity which led to violent suppressions and expulsions of foreign missionaries. Under strict supervision only the Dutch could trade with Japan. Between 1600 and 1 750, religion, commerce, and warfare helped transform Europe and change the nature of political authority.